On Trump & tirades; April 1 snowpack update
Also: Oil executives blast White House econ policies;
𤯠Trump Ticker š±
Last week, one of the Land Deskās more conservative readers cancelled his paid subscription. He wrote that he appreciated my passion for public lands, but was no longer interested in reading what he called a ātirade against Trump.ā
This type of thing happens all the time in this business, and, unlike Elon Musk, Iām not looking for your pity. But I was a bit saddened, given that this person had been a paid subscriber since the Land Desk was launched, and because I really do appreciate having readers and commenters from across the political spectrum.
Besides, while Iām prone to a rant now and then, I do think ātiradeā is taking it a little too far. Anyway, my point in telling yāall this is to let you know that writing about Trumpās shenanigans every dispatch is just about the last thing I want to be doing with my time. Iād much rather be delving into old maps, getting into the nuances of Western water, exploring the history of floods and droughts and wildfires, taking contrarian views on the housing crisis, or dissecting the contradictions of oil and gas markets. And I will continue to do all of that.
At the same time, itās impossible for me to ignore the barrage of destruction, corruption, chaos, authoritarianism, and incompetence emanating from the White House. My passion for public lands ā and for justice, truth, reason, morality, decency, intelligence, and kindness ā demands that I document these egregious acts, and do my part to resist them, even if it is just by informing my readership about whatās happening.
I am not impartial, not by any means. I am partial to the planet and its survival, toward my fellow human beings, toward peace and justice and compassion and truth. I am not, however, partisan: I will scrutinize Democrats and Republicans equally, fact-check the left and the right, and give credit where credit is due ā even to Donald Trump.
***
And on that note: The Trump administration appears to have unfrozen nearly $4.2 million in federal funding to help the Hopi Tribe build a solar-powered microgrid to run two remote wells and associated infrastructure that will provide water to Upper and Lower Moenkopi. The funding was approved by the Biden Energy Department, Trump froze it as part of a larger stop on Infrastructure and Inflation Reduction law money, but now it has been released. So good on you, Donny!
Now, how about you direct your Environmental Protection Agency to release funding for the Walker River Paiute Tribe to expand access to clean water and electric power infrastructure, and for Navajo Powerās program to bring solar to off-grid homes.
***
Though it may be inadvertent, Trumpās economic policies may ultimately benefit the environment in some ways. The haphazard, on-again, off-again tariffs, for example, along with the gutting of the federal governmentās workforce, have sent the stock market into a tailspin. Meanwhile, the tariffs ā along with reciprocal tariffs levied by the U.S.ās trading partners ā will increase prices on most consumer goods. People will buy less, travel less, which will mean less pollution and environmental impacts.
***
And yet more kudos for Trump! Seriously. Despite all of his bluster, Trump has managed to really piss off oil and gas executives ā the same ones that were throwing money at his campaign just a few months ago ā and possibly dampen drilling on public lands.
See, the thing about tariffs is that they very well may raise the price you pay for gasoline (depending on where your local refinery gets its crude oil), but the economy-dampening part of tariffs actually brings down the price of oil, while also raising the cost of steel pipes and other supplies. Thatās no bueno for petroleum companies, whose profit margins are directly proportional to the price of crude.
Many of these folks wonāt criticize Trump in public, given his vindictive and authoritarian leanings, but give them the cover of anonymity, as a Dallas Federal Reserve survey did, and they go off on the White Houseās herky-jerky non-policies. Hereās a sampling:
The key word to describe 2025 so far is āuncertaintyā and as a public company, our investors hate uncertainty ⦠This uncertainty is being caused by the conflicting messages coming from the new administration. There cannot be "U.S. energy dominance" and $50 per barrel oil; those two statements are contradictory. At $50-per-barrel oil, we will see U.S. oil production start to decline immediately and likely significantly (1 million barrels per day plus within a couple quarters). This is not āenergy dominance.
The administration's chaos is a disaster for the commodity markets. "Drill, baby, drill" is nothing short of a myth and populist rallying cry. Tariff policy is impossible for us to predict and doesn't have a clear goal. We want more stability.
The administrationās tariffs immediately increased the cost of our casing and tubing by 25 percent even though inventory costs our pipe brokers less. "Drill, baby, drill" does not work with $50 per barrel oil. Rigs will get dropped, employment in the oil industry will decrease, and U.S. oil production will decline as it did during COVID-19.
The rhetoric from the current administration is not helpful. If the oil price continues to drop, we will shut in production and do quick drilling.
There was only one mention of regulations getting in the way of the oil business, and that wasnāt federal rules, but state ones:
Our program is located in central California. California's government continues to undermine permitting by their staff's inactivity and delays. Ongoing actions in that bureaucracy are increasing costs and regulatory hurdles, hampering investment in the state.
Demand has lessened resulting in a lower oil price. The same applies to gas. Unstable capital markets are affecting oil prices. The political climate caused by the new presidential administration appears to be creating instability. Energy markets are not exempt from the loss of public faith in all markets.
We are all busy here.
Well, there you have it, folks.
***
Oh, and these oil companies might also be angry that the MAGAs are all buying Teslas ā or at least pretending to ā in order to āown the libs.ā Which is pretty funny, given the amount of gibberish Trump devoted to dissing electric vehicles during his campaign rallies. Tesla also stands to benefit the most from Trumpās tariffs, another dig at the internal combustion fans.
***
Maybe the national parks will be a bit less crowded this summer, as well, as international travel ebbs.
Anyone whoās traveled the Western national park service knows that they are popular with overseas visitors. On a single grocery run at the Page, Arizona, Safeway recently, I heard no fewer than three different languages spoken, in addition to Navajo and English, and that was in the off-season. In 2018 (the last year that data is available), more than 14 million international travelers visited U.S. national parks and monuments. About 14% of the Grand Canyon National Parksā visitors were from overseas, with about 6% of Zionās visitation from overseas.
Tourism Economics is predicting that international travel to the U.S. will be down significantly this year, thanks not only to the administrationās hostile economic moves, but also āpolarizing Trump administration policies and rhetoric.ā Also, thereās that thing where travelers have been detained at the border, even thrown in jail, simply for trying to get a visa. This decline undoubtedly will impact Western U.S. tourism and national park and monument visitation numbers. Not good for the tourism economy, but it might give the parks a much needed rest.
š„µ Aridification Watch š«
Itās first-of-the-month snowpack update time again, and this will likely be the last of the season barring some freak climatic shift over the next several weeks. Snowpack levels typically peak in mid-elevation areas in mid- to late-March, and in the high country in mid- to late-April, meaning we are now headed into spring runoff season.
Generally speaking, itās looking like runoff will be average to paltry, depending on which side of the snow-divide your watershed falls. It is a very jagged line, by the way, with places in the west and north having average to above average snowpack, while the southern-Interior West generally had a super dry winter. But even within those areas there are sort of outliers: The Grand Traverse ski race between Aspen and Crested Butte was canceled due to lack of snow for the first time in its 26-year history.
And thereās big variations over short distances. Red Mountain Pass is still just below median, for example, while the southern San Juan Mountains, just a few dozen miles away, are experiencing a severely dry winter.
Before I get to the graphics, however, a quick note. The snowpack and precipitation plots I run here come from the USDAās Natural Resources Conservation Service. Itās just one of the valuable services they provide. I havenāt found any stats on whether DOGE has gone after NRCSās staff, yet. But the DOGE website says it has or will cancel the leases for the following NRCS offices. Whether they and their staffs will simply go away, be absorbed into another facility, or what, isnāt disclosed.
Natural Resource Conservation Service offices slated for lease cancellations: Missoula, Montana; Wasilla and Fairbanks, Alaska; Logan, Utah; Gallup and Raton, New Mexico; Yuma, Arizona; Dayton, Puyallup, and Renton, Washington; Portland, Oregon; and Woodland, Yreka, Salinas, Oxnard, and Blythe, California.
Hopefully the staff of these offices and services they provide will endure.
Now to the snowpack plots. I included the plots for 2021 and 2023 because those were the most recent big and crappy years for snowpack.





If you want to know more about the drought and the Colorado River basin, Iād suggest checking out the Wright-Ingraham Instituteās interactive Drought Interfaces app. Itās super cool and informative.
Iām going to invite five folks to become new subscribers to take this personās place.
At KSUT I had a conservative member who often called to complain. We were playing music by the then scorned Dixie Chicks, now the Chicks. And countless other slights from his point of view. He would rant, āAnd Iām a member.ā I finally wrote him a check for his $100 membership and sent it in a hand written note that said, āThe success of our radio station is based upon great relationships. It would appear that we are not a good fit for you at this time so Iām refunding your membership.ā The calls stopped and then two years later he quietly became a member again.
This post from Wilderness Watch in reference to the "Explore Act" which passed with bi-partisan agreement should be read by all of us! I remember commenting before it was passed but apparently, folks who disagreed with it, were ignored. I'm pretty sure that anyone who reads this blog might feel the way I do - we do NOT need more humans tramping about in the very few Wilderness areas that are left!
https://wildernesswatch.org/conflating-recreation-with-conservation-is-not-wilderness-preservation/